# Project Research Summary

## Executive Summary

This is a weekly task management application designed to help users organize their weekly schedules with a focus on task and calendar integration. Experts build this type of application using a layered architecture that separates frontend, backend, and data layers. The recommended stack includes React for the frontend with Zustand for state management, Node.js/Express for the backend, and PostgreSQL with Prisma for data persistence. A key architectural decision is to separate calendar integration into its own service layer to handle the complexities of syncing with multiple providers like Google and Apple calendars.

The core value proposition centers around the ability to display both tasks and calendar events in a unified weekly view, which reduces the need to switch between different applications. Key features include a weekly view display, task creation/editing/deletion, day navigation, and intuitive drag-and-drop functionality for reorganizing tasks between days.

Critical risks and pitfalls include inconsistent calendar synchronization behavior across providers, poor drag-and-drop performance that affects user experience, and data loss due to reliance on client-side storage alone. These pitfalls can significantly impact adoption and user satisfaction if not properly addressed through careful design and implementation practices.

## Key Findings

### Stack
- **React 18.x**: Component-based architecture with strong ecosystem for UI-heavy applications
- **Node.js 18.x**: Mature ecosystem and good performance for backend services
- **Express.js 4.x**: Lightweight and flexible API development framework
- **PostgreSQL 14+**: ACID compliance and strong data integrity for structured task data
- **Prisma 5.x**: Type-safe database access and migration management
- **Vercel**: Seamless deployment and CI/CD for React applications
- **Supabase**: Managed backend services for authentication, storage, and database
- **Zustand 4.x**: Lightweight state management for global application state
- **React Query 5.x**: Efficient server state management and API data synchronization

### Features
- **Table Stakes**: Weekly view display, task creation/editing/deletion, day navigation, drag-and-drop between days
- **Differentiators**: Calendar integration, combined task/event view, smart scheduling suggestions, theme customization, recurring tasks, priority levels
- **Anti-Features**: Multi-user collaboration, complex filtering/searching, reporting analytics, email integration, desktop application
- **MVP Focus**: Prioritize core UI components and basic functionality before advanced features

### Architecture
- **Layered Architecture**: Distinct frontend, backend, data, and integration layers for scalability and maintainability
- **Component Boundaries**: Clear separation of responsibilities between frontend, backend API, database, and calendar integration services
- **Data Flow**: User interactions flow through frontend → backend API → database, with calendar integration as an additional service layer
- **Patterns**: Layered architecture, observer pattern for real-time updates, service layer for calendar integration

### Pitfalls
1. **Inconsistent Calendar Sync**: Different behaviors between Google and Apple calendars leading to data discrepancies
2. **Poor Drag-and-Drop Performance**: Laggy or unresponsive operations affecting user experience
3. **Data Loss Risk**: Reliance on client-side storage without backup mechanisms
4. **UI Overcomplication**: Adding excessive features that overwhelm users
5. **Inadequate Error Handling**: Crashes or freezes from unexpected inputs or network issues

## Implications for Roadmap

Based on the research findings, the recommended roadmap structure prioritizes foundational components that support core functionality while avoiding known pitfalls:

### Phase 1: Core Foundation
**Rationale:** Establish essential UI components and basic API infrastructure before tackling complex integrations
**Delivers:** Working weekly view, task CRUD operations, basic navigation, and drag-and-drop functionality
**Features from FEATURES.md:** Weekly view display, task creation/editing/deletion, day navigation, drag-and-drop between days
**Pitfall Mitigation:** Avoid overcomplicating initial UI; focus on minimal viable product

### Phase 2: Data Persistence & Management
**Rationale:** Build the backend data services that will support the frontend and enable future features
**Delivers:** Full CRUD operations backed by PostgreSQL database with Prisma ORM
**Features from FEATURES.md:** All table stakes features plus backend API infrastructure
**Pitfall Mitigation:** Implement proper error handling and database migration planning

### Phase 3: Calendar Integration
**Rationale:** Integrate external calendar services as a distinct layer to enable combined views
**Delivers:** Google and Apple calendar synchronization with unified weekly view
**Features from FEATURES.md:** Calendar integration (Google/Apple), combined task/event view
**Pitfall Mitigation:** Implement unified calendar abstraction to prevent inconsistent behavior

### Phase 4: Advanced Features
**Rationale:** Enhance user experience with differentiators that add value beyond basic task management
**Delivers:** Theme customization, recurring tasks, priority levels, smart scheduling suggestions
**Features from FEATURES.md:** Theme customization, recurring tasks, priority levels, smart scheduling suggestions
**Pitfall Mitigation:** Maintain focus on user experience and avoid feature bloat

## Research Flags

**Needs research:** Phase 3 (Calendar Integration) - Requires deep dive into OAuth implementations and calendar API specifics
**Needs research:** Phase 4 (Advanced Features) - Needs validation of smart scheduling algorithms and theme customization options

**Standard patterns:** Phase 1 (Core Foundation) - Well-established patterns for React frontend and basic API development
**Standard patterns:** Phase 2 (Data Persistence) - Standard database and ORM setup with PostgreSQL/Prisma

## Confidence Assessment

| Area | Confidence | Notes |
|------|------------|-------|
| Stack | HIGH | Clear technology recommendations with strong ecosystem support |
| Features | HIGH | Comprehensive feature analysis with clear MVP prioritization |
| Architecture | HIGH | Well-defined layered architecture with established patterns |
| Pitfalls | HIGH | Thorough identification of critical and moderate risks |

**Gaps:** 
- Detailed calendar API integration specifics
- Smart scheduling algorithm requirements
- Theme customization design system details

## Sources

- Current web development trends and best practices (2025)
- Popular task management application technologies
- Developer survey results on preferred frameworks and tools
- Industry analysis of popular task management applications
- User research on calendar integration needs
- Feature comparison studies of productivity tools
- General software architecture principles from Martin Fowler's writings
- Layered architecture patterns commonly used in web applications
- Task management application design patterns from industry best practices
- Post-mortems from popular task management applications
- Issue discussions in open-source task management projects
- Community feedback on productivity tools
- UX research on calendar integration challenges
- Developer forums discussing web application performance bottlenecks