A page either side marks as a full-page ad is skipped by that side's quality
run, so comparing its near-empty boxes against the same page freshly OCR'd
on the other side (ad-marking is a one-time manual step) was a review-state
difference, not a pipeline one, skewing whole-issue numbers. Verified: text
similarity 0.837->0.870, box precision 0.62->0.66 on the real re-import.
Also records the clean from-scratch re-ingest results: the ingest-time
duplicate-check ordering fix is proven in isolation (0 additional duplicates
found afterward, vs 13 before the fix), and the auto-chained Auto-fix ran
end to end.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
