My-Weekly-ToDo-List/Version 01/.planning/research/ARCHITECTURE.md
mARTin d92a8c7210 feat: add task actions (notes/delete) and refine animation logic
- Added 'onDelete' and 'onNotes' support to TaskItem.
- Implemented hover actions (Delete and Notes icons) for tasks.
- Added Notes Modal for editing task markdown content.
- Simplified navigation animation to remove blank flash (single-phase slide-in).
- Fixed syntax error in updateTask function.
- Updated styles for modal and task actions.
2026-02-01 12:25:53 +01:00

5.0 KiB

Architecture Patterns

Domain: Weekly Scheduler with Calendar Integration Researched: Sat Jan 24 2026

A weekly scheduler with calendar integration typically follows a component-based architecture with clear separation between UI presentation, data management, and external integrations.

The core architecture consists of:

  1. Presentation Layer - Responsible for rendering the weekly schedule grid
  2. Data Management Layer - Handles task storage, retrieval, and organization
  3. Calendar Integration Layer - Manages connections to external calendar services
  4. Business Logic Layer - Manages scheduling rules and workflows

Component Boundaries

Component Responsibility Communicates With
Weekly View Component Renders the weekly schedule grid with days and time slots Task Data Store, Navigation Controls
Task List Component Displays tasks for a specific week/day Data Store, Task Creation Form
Task Creation Form Handles creating/editing tasks with validation Data Store, Validation Layer
Navigation Controls Manage week navigation (previous/next week) Data Store, Week Calculator
Data Store Centralized storage and management of tasks and schedule data Persistence Layer, UI Components
Persistence Layer Handles local storage or database operations Data Store, External Sync
Calendar Sync Service Manages integration with external calendars (Google, Apple) Calendar APIs, Data Store
Week Calculation Service Handles date calculations and week boundary logic Navigation Components, Data Store
Validation Layer Validates task data before saving Form Components, Data Store

Data Flow

  1. User Interaction: User interacts with UI (clicking days, creating tasks)
  2. Component Updates: UI components update state or dispatch actions
  3. Data Processing: Business logic processes task creation/update/deletion
  4. Storage Operation: Data Store coordinates with persistence layer
  5. External Sync: Calendar sync service handles external calendar integration
  6. UI Refresh: Changes propagate back to UI through state updates

Patterns to Follow

Pattern 1: Component-Based Architecture

What: Break the application into reusable, self-contained components When: For maintainability and scalability of UI elements Example:

// WeeklyView Component
function WeeklyView({ tasks, onTaskSelect, onTaskCreate }) {
  return (
    <div className="weekly-view">
      <WeekNavigation />
      <DayColumns tasks={tasks} />
    </div>
  );
}

Pattern 2: State Management with Context API or Similar

What: Centralized state management for task data and UI state When: When multiple components need access to the same data Example:

const TaskContext = createContext();

function TaskProvider({ children }) {
  const [tasks, setTasks] = useState([]);
  
  return (
    <TaskContext.Provider value={{ tasks, setTasks }}>
      {children}
    </TaskContext.Provider>
  );
}

Pattern 3: Observer Pattern for Calendar Sync

What: Event-driven architecture for keeping data synchronized When: For external calendar integration and real-time updates Example:

class CalendarSyncService {
  constructor() {
    this.observers = [];
  }
  
  subscribe(observer) {
    this.observers.push(observer);
  }
  
  notifyObservers(change) {
    this.observers.forEach(obs => obs.update(change));
  }
}

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

Anti-Pattern 1: Monolithic Component Structure

What: Having one massive component that handles everything Why bad: Makes code hard to maintain, debug, and test Instead: Break into smaller, focused components

Anti-Pattern 2: Direct DOM Manipulation

What: Interacting directly with DOM elements instead of using state management Why bad: Breaks React's declarative model, leads to unpredictable UI states Instead: Use React state and props for all UI changes

Anti-Pattern 3: Inconsistent Data Flow

What: Mixing different state management patterns throughout the app Why bad: Makes code hard to reason about and maintain Instead: Choose one consistent pattern (Context API, Redux, or Jotai)

Scalability Considerations

Concern At 100 users At 10K users At 1M users
UI Rendering Standard rendering Virtualized lists for performance Server-side rendering + caching
Data Storage Client-side storage (localStorage) Backend database with indexing Distributed database with sharding
Calendar Sync Client-side polling Background sync jobs Asynchronous processing queues
Concurrent Access Single user context Multi-user isolation Database transactions with locking

Sources

  • React-based calendar application architecture patterns
  • Modern web application design principles
  • Calendar integration best practices (Google Calendar API, Apple Calendar API)