- Added 'onDelete' and 'onNotes' support to TaskItem. - Implemented hover actions (Delete and Notes icons) for tasks. - Added Notes Modal for editing task markdown content. - Simplified navigation animation to remove blank flash (single-phase slide-in). - Fixed syntax error in updateTask function. - Updated styles for modal and task actions.
5.0 KiB
Architecture Patterns
Domain: Weekly Scheduler with Calendar Integration Researched: Sat Jan 24 2026
Recommended Architecture
A weekly scheduler with calendar integration typically follows a component-based architecture with clear separation between UI presentation, data management, and external integrations.
The core architecture consists of:
- Presentation Layer - Responsible for rendering the weekly schedule grid
- Data Management Layer - Handles task storage, retrieval, and organization
- Calendar Integration Layer - Manages connections to external calendar services
- Business Logic Layer - Manages scheduling rules and workflows
Component Boundaries
| Component | Responsibility | Communicates With |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly View Component | Renders the weekly schedule grid with days and time slots | Task Data Store, Navigation Controls |
| Task List Component | Displays tasks for a specific week/day | Data Store, Task Creation Form |
| Task Creation Form | Handles creating/editing tasks with validation | Data Store, Validation Layer |
| Navigation Controls | Manage week navigation (previous/next week) | Data Store, Week Calculator |
| Data Store | Centralized storage and management of tasks and schedule data | Persistence Layer, UI Components |
| Persistence Layer | Handles local storage or database operations | Data Store, External Sync |
| Calendar Sync Service | Manages integration with external calendars (Google, Apple) | Calendar APIs, Data Store |
| Week Calculation Service | Handles date calculations and week boundary logic | Navigation Components, Data Store |
| Validation Layer | Validates task data before saving | Form Components, Data Store |
Data Flow
- User Interaction: User interacts with UI (clicking days, creating tasks)
- Component Updates: UI components update state or dispatch actions
- Data Processing: Business logic processes task creation/update/deletion
- Storage Operation: Data Store coordinates with persistence layer
- External Sync: Calendar sync service handles external calendar integration
- UI Refresh: Changes propagate back to UI through state updates
Patterns to Follow
Pattern 1: Component-Based Architecture
What: Break the application into reusable, self-contained components When: For maintainability and scalability of UI elements Example:
// WeeklyView Component
function WeeklyView({ tasks, onTaskSelect, onTaskCreate }) {
return (
<div className="weekly-view">
<WeekNavigation />
<DayColumns tasks={tasks} />
</div>
);
}
Pattern 2: State Management with Context API or Similar
What: Centralized state management for task data and UI state When: When multiple components need access to the same data Example:
const TaskContext = createContext();
function TaskProvider({ children }) {
const [tasks, setTasks] = useState([]);
return (
<TaskContext.Provider value={{ tasks, setTasks }}>
{children}
</TaskContext.Provider>
);
}
Pattern 3: Observer Pattern for Calendar Sync
What: Event-driven architecture for keeping data synchronized When: For external calendar integration and real-time updates Example:
class CalendarSyncService {
constructor() {
this.observers = [];
}
subscribe(observer) {
this.observers.push(observer);
}
notifyObservers(change) {
this.observers.forEach(obs => obs.update(change));
}
}
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
Anti-Pattern 1: Monolithic Component Structure
What: Having one massive component that handles everything Why bad: Makes code hard to maintain, debug, and test Instead: Break into smaller, focused components
Anti-Pattern 2: Direct DOM Manipulation
What: Interacting directly with DOM elements instead of using state management Why bad: Breaks React's declarative model, leads to unpredictable UI states Instead: Use React state and props for all UI changes
Anti-Pattern 3: Inconsistent Data Flow
What: Mixing different state management patterns throughout the app Why bad: Makes code hard to reason about and maintain Instead: Choose one consistent pattern (Context API, Redux, or Jotai)
Scalability Considerations
| Concern | At 100 users | At 10K users | At 1M users |
|---|---|---|---|
| UI Rendering | Standard rendering | Virtualized lists for performance | Server-side rendering + caching |
| Data Storage | Client-side storage (localStorage) | Backend database with indexing | Distributed database with sharding |
| Calendar Sync | Client-side polling | Background sync jobs | Asynchronous processing queues |
| Concurrent Access | Single user context | Multi-user isolation | Database transactions with locking |
Sources
- React-based calendar application architecture patterns
- Modern web application design principles
- Calendar integration best practices (Google Calendar API, Apple Calendar API)